 |
One
of the biggest problems with
bandwidth theft is that a lot
of people don't fully
understand just what
bandwidth is or the effects
of bandwidth theft on the
Internet. There are a lot of
people explaining it in
technical terms, but
hopefully this page can
explain it a way that may hit
closer to home. The analogies
I may use are not exact, but
are intended to compare
bandwidth and bandwidth theft
to situations everyone can
relate to.
What is
bandwidth?
Think
of it as (here comes the
analogy) the amount of
electricity used to play
sound files and display
images on the Internet.
In the same way that a 40
watt light bulb and a
frost-free freezer use
different amounts of
electricity, different
types of files use
different amounts of
bandwidth.
Whenever
a music or image file is
linked to, the server
that houses that file has
to supply the bandwidth
necessary to get that
file to your email page
or wherever else you link
from. Keep in mind this
means the length of time
it takes you to write the
letter as well as
everytime that letter is
read by the person you
sent it to and by anyone
they may have forwarded
it to. In the case of
newsgroups that allow
active html in posts,
that server is supplying
their bandwith everytime
someone reads a post.
So,
what is bandwidth theft?
Ever
go to a gif and midi site
and see something like,
"Please transload
these files to your own
server. Do not link to
them."? If you
ignore that request and
link to them anyway,
that's bandwidth theft.
But it
says "Free Gifs and
Midis" at the site I
linked to!
That
means they are free in
the sense that there are
no copyright restrictions
on them. Some websites
sell original graphics.
When you link to these
free midis and images
without permission, you
are forcing someone else
to pay the cost of
getting that file from
it's home server to your
page. If any of us ever
discovered that one of
the neighbors had run an
extention cord into our
house to power up his
appliances we would most
likely take the matter to
the police, yet we expect
servers to allow us to do
the same thing.
Who
"owns" it and
who pays for it?
Back
to the electricity
analogy: The electric
company "owns"
the electricity until you
use it. Then you are
billed for what you use.
An ISP charges a server
for the amount of
bandwidth that is used
monthly. The server also
charges commercial
website owners for the
amount of bandwidth they
use. Some have a monthly
allotment and then are
charged extra when they
exceed that amount. The
servers and commercial
website owners pay for
the bandwidth and it is
up to that them how to
use it.
The
way most servers and site
owners compensate for
their "bandwidth
bills" is by
charging advertisers for
placing ads on pages. The
more traffic, or page
hits, they have, the more
they can charge an
advertiser. That's why so
many of them offer free
personal homepages...more
subscribers = more pages
= more hits = more
advertising revenue. The
money made from
advertising offsets the
money spent for
bandwidth. When someone
is "remote
linking" to a file
the server still pays for
the bandwidth, but
doesn't get the page hits
to justify their
advertising fees.
Advertising revenue
decreases, but bandwidth
usage keeps rising.
Remember,
.com stands for
commercial. These are not
non-profit businesses.
Many commercial sites
have been forced to close
because they could not
afford to keep paying
their increased bandwidth
charges.

top
templates
christian templates christian
images christian graphics
christian hosting christian web
hosting,
|
 |